Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal staff members have until February 6 to choose whether to their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to depart and be paid up until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment attorney who represents federal employees as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really don’t consider it a lot a deal. I think it’s a demand to resign with a vague guarantee that, possibly, you could be kept in administrative leave status for approximately eight months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been using the term buyout to describe what this is since there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately eight months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I believe that’s a very misleading term to use in this scenario. When you consider a buyout, there’s usually some sort of composed contract or a concrete deal to provide a benefit in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for employment your suggestions, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout extreme caution. There are no guarantees contained in this e-mail. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you alter your mind, the agency’s probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially providing up control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of staff member who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: employment Folks near retirement require to be the most careful due to the fact that leaving earlier than intended can have major effects, possibly, employment on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who don’t want to go back to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a tip to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the choice to resign, employment and this administration is really kindly providing to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s designed to get folks who work really tough to resign. I think it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes due to the fact that there are no guarantees. And these are people who like their job. They enjoy the mission of the agency. They strive. And today, they’re facing very difficult options, especially if they’re remote. I imply, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal obstacles simply to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be honest, is so unmatched that I believe a lot of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I’m uncertain if the offer itself may be challengeable. I think the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists right now for OPM to order agencies to give this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is really much potentially setting the phase for obstacles because I feel OPM has actually vastly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our website regards to usage and employment permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are developed on a rush deadline by an NPR specialist. This text may not be in its last type and may be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and schedule may vary. The reliable record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.